Nevada Career Institute +

FAIR USE OF COPYRIGHT IMAGES
Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use.

Related articles on
Madilyn Cole of Las Vegas, NV:
Baltimore Sun Exposes Corrupt Michelle Leavitt
Jan 2025 Pet Google Candidate Madilyn Cole Loses
Jan 2025 Official Madilyn Cole Election Results
Jan 2025 Non-Indexed Madilyn Cole Exposed Website
Jan 2025 SkopeNow Spyware Used Against Madilyn Cole Critics

Last Updated: Wednesday, January 22nd 2025

Jan 2025 SkopeNow Inc tied to Madilyn Cole Exposed: How to Request Nevada Public Records

A coward can run, but a coward cannot hide. The Nevada Public Records Act (Act) is found in Nevada Revised Statutes N.R.S.) Chapter 239. Nevada’s Public Records Law was enacted to ensure that government documents are available to the public. The Legislature’s intent is clear:

The Nevada Public Records Act is a Nevada law that holds Nevada government officials responsible for government transparency. With the recent discovery that SkopeNow Inc has been deployed against free-speech critics in Nevada, the Nevada Public Records Act is one of several resources that one should consider to investigate government corruption or corrupt poliitcal/judicial candidates.

According to CyberSecurity Reports generated by our CyberSecurity Department, certain acts have been traced to certain NV government workers. Such acts were subsequently traced to SkopeNow Inc in general. Ultimately, forensic evidence was tied to various websites (e.g., Madilyn Cole Exposed) that publish free-speech criticism of former judicial candidate Madilyn Cole, a/k/a/ by her political name Madilyn "Leavitt" Cole.

The recent discovery that a former Las Vegas, NV judicial candidate and current Clark County, NV prosecutor is a Person-Of-Interest in using or benefitting from spyware products sold by SkopeNow Inc. is a matter of public concern and publc interest.

The products of SkopeNow Inc. are marketed to law enforcement agencies, government agencies, and lawyers. Defeated judicial candidate, and Chief Deputy District Attorney, Madilyn Cole, coincidentally, was in fact endorsed by a combination of all three industries either directly, or indirectly. For starters, Madilyn Cole is a Clark County, NV government worker; Madilyn Cole was endorsed by Clark County, NV District Attorney Steve Wolfson; Madilyn Cole solicited and received donations from several rich Las vegas, NV law firms; and, Madilyn Cole has been endorsed by several organizations tied to Law Enforcement; including, but not limited to, Henderson Police Supervisors Association (HPSA), North Las-Vegas Police Officers Association, Clark County District Attorney Investigators Association, etc.

Add the elements of Motive (Madilyn Cole is very bitter about the content posted on Madilyn Cole Exposed website, and furious about being defeated in a judicial election she thought she deserved to win); Opportunity (Madilyn Cole is a Chief Deputy District Attorney); Madilyn Cole is a BYU graduate; the element of racial animus exists; and, Tools (SkopeNow is sold to law enforcement agencies), and if you add the fact that Google Inc refuses to index the Madilyn Cole Exposed website, even a juvenile can reasonably predict who initiated a SkopeNow inquiry.

Put two and two together to get four.

Hyped by her friends, and family as being "Smart", The Madilyn Cole Exposed website repeatedly questions the I.Q. level, the academic aptitute, the genetics of Madilyn Cole, and her fitness to be judge. The fact that Madiltn Cole raised and spent over $250,000 and still lost, and somehow her campaign is tied to SkopeNow products, is evidence this woman is in need of a mental check up.

The fact that SkopeNow tools have been traced to being used against the critics of Madilyn Cole should embarass the supporters of Madilyn Cole: WE TOLD YOU SO, BUT YOU WERE TOO DUMB TO LISTEN! GET YOUR HEAD FROM YOUR REAR-END.

SkopeNow Spyware tied to Spying On Las Vegas, Nevada Residents: Nevada Public Records Request

SkopeNow Inc. is a perfect example why the United States of America has fallen behind China in terms of technology. From a peasant country during WWII, China now has the world's larget Navy. Look at the founders of SkopeNow Inc.. Robert Douglas, cat lady Diane Tassone Krause, Anthony Winslow, and Mark Derrenberger. These persons are an academic joke at best.

U.S. Government agencies are entrusting data from SkopeNow Inc while China is hacking the U.S. Department of Treasury. China DOES NOT even want the worthless and tainted data of SkopeNow!!

Frost & Sullivan is a suspicious third-party firm that reports on OSINT companies like SkopeNow Inc. Their suspicious reporter claims that Skopenow stood out as #1. Amazing, now critics know what level of incompetence American agencies are willing to tolerate.

The fact that Madilyn Cole is a Person of Interest suspected of spying on her best and most effective critics underscores the apparent accuracy of the Madilyn Cole Exposed content. The truth is very painful to accept for most persons.

SkopeNow Inc. has multiple contracts with government agencies, law enforcment agencies, and some of the most corrupt lawyers and government workers in America.

Robert Douglas is paid millions to be stupid and incompent while China only hires the best educated, the best students, and the BEST of the BEST!!!

Robert Douglas. markets his unethical products as Anonymous and that use of SkopeNow is unknown to the target(s). Yeah, he is partially right. SkopeNow products are anonymous to Div. III graduates, the uninformed, the less educated.

The verfiied public address of SkopeNow Inc. is 349 5TH AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES, 10017.The New York Department of State iD for SkopeNow is #DOS ID:4967646.

To serve legal papers on SkopeNow Inc., one may serve the New York Department of State, as well as the official Registered Agent of SkopeNow, Inc., or personally present the legal papers to Robert Douglas.

INFERIOR SKOPENOW PRODUCTS
SkopeNow Inc sells Spyware that targets Americans who exerise their free-speech rights. SkopeNow Inc. is staffed with low-tier N.C.A.A. Division III graduates, and lackluster Divison I graduates who attended inferior colleges and universities. Their data-inflated products are engineered for the dumb, and re-sold to the more-dumb as purported OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) Intelligence.

Nevada Public Records Request: How to Respond to Nevada Agencies Seeking to Hide or Refuse a Public Records Request

It is very common for corrupt judicial candidates, corrupt government employees, and police agenicies to deny a legitimate request for Public Records.

In the event of an agency’s unlawful refusal to provide access to public records, citizens may bring civil actions in district court in order to obtain compliance with the law. If the requester (person) prevails, the court will order the agency to produce the record(s) and pay the requester’s attorney’s fees.

Open government is an essential element of democracy. As such, the purpose of the NPRA is to foster open government by making open government an obligation of Executive Branch agencies. Agencies should be cautioned that a deliberate concealment of public records may result in a risk of criminal conviction, should they be accused of violating NPRA.

The recommended procedure is to BOTH file a public request AND have a PREPARED LAWSUIT ready to file. Put the Communist on notice of your serious intentions.

the target of your request is a government worker, a Clark County, NV employee, or received funds or endorsements from government employees, you may want to consider letting it be known that you will expand the Nevada Public Records Request.

Application to Nevada Court to Order Release2 of Public Records Held by Snitches

NRS 239.011 Application to court for order allowing inspection or copying, or requiring that copy be provided, of public book or record in legal custody or control of governmental entity for less than 30 years.

1. If a request for inspection, copying or copies of a public book or record open to inspection and copying is denied, the requester may apply to the district court in the county in which the book or record is located for an order:
   
   1. (a) Permitting the requester to inspect or copy the book or record; or
   2. (b) Requiring the person who has legal custody or control of the public book or record to provide a copy to the requester, as applicable.
2. If a request for inspection, copying or copies of a public book or record open to inspection and copying is denied, the requester may apply to the district court in the county in which the book or record is located for an order:
   The court shall give this matter priority over other civil matters to which priority is not given by other statutes. If the requester prevails, the requester is entitled to recover his or her costs and reasonable attorney’s fees in the proceeding from the governmental entity whose officer has custody of the book or record.

Nevada Public Records Request: Illegally Removing, injuring or concealing public records and documents

NRS 239.310 Removing, injuring or concealing public records and documents. A person who willfully and unlawfully removes, alters, mutilates, destroys, conceals or obliterates a record, map, book, paper, document or other thing filed or deposited in a public office, or with any public officer, by authority of law, is guilty of a category C felony and shall be punished as provided in NRS 193.130.

What is an Official Nevada Public Record

According to Nevada statutes, N.R.S. 239.005(6) concludes that "Official state record" includes, without limitation:
Papers, unpublished books, maps and photographs; Information stored on magnetic tape or computer, laser or optical disc; Materials that are capable of being read by a machine, including, without limitation, microforms and audio and visual materials; and Materials that are made or received by a state agency and preserved by that agency or its successor as evidence of the organization, operation, policy or any other activity of that agency or because of the information contained in the material.

Conclusion: Nevada Public Records Request

Requests for public records shall be directed to the records official of the agency. The request should be made on the standard records request form. The request may be verbal, hand-delivered, mailed, emailed, or sent via facsimile to the agency.21 If the request is extraordinary, according to NPRA, the records official shall require the request to be submitted in writing.

A written request is preferred, however, if an oral request, in person or by phone, is received, the agency may consider confirming the request in writing in order to eliminate any confusion regarding the request.

Should Judicial Candidates Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics Illegally?
YesNo