Page 1 of 2
Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 2:46 am
by MadilynC
Madilyn Cole News Links SkopeNow Inc. to Madilyn Cole Exposed website
SkopeNow is typically used by law enforcement agencies to harass, frame innocent persons, and intimidate their free-speech. It is also used by corrupt lawyers. Madilyn Cole is widely endorsed and supported by persons employed in the same industries advertised by SkopeNow Inc. Put two and two together to get four. Plus, the Madilyn Cole website is NOT INDEXED by Google. Only a corrupt cop or prosecutor has that type of authority.
Should a Judicial Candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics? Is that ethical or illegal? Share your opinions?
Re: Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:17 am
by lasvegas-schools
No Judicial candidate should be spying on critics FOR ANY reason whatsoever. If Madilyn Cole cannot accept Free-Speech then clearly she is not suitable to be judge. Thank you for the post.
Re: Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:50 am
by Innocent_One
I know the feeling of being framed. The Clark County, NV District Attorney office framed Kristin Lobata. I was held down for 15 years. They lied about be and used a corrupt Judge Valorie Vega against me. There is no legitimate reason to use spyware against critics.
6
Re: Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:50 am
by Innocent_One
I know the feeling of being framed. The Clark County, NV District Attorney office framed Kristin Lobata. I was held down for 15 years. They lied about be and used a corrupt Judge Valorie Vega against me. There is no legitimate reason to use spyware against critics.
Re: Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 1:04 am
by LvegasCop
If she is afraid of free-speech, I understand why she does not want to have the opinions of others published. Apparently, she wants prosecute her critics because the truth is too painful to accept. She is a Leavitt.
Social Engineering vs. SkopeNow Inc. Exposing Users of SkopeNow Inc.*
Re: Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 1:13 am
by Natasha001
Only a coward uses spyware against critics. What is Madilyn Cole afraid of?
Madilyn Cole is Corrupt.*
Re: Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 1:19 am
by Natasha001
Why is the bitch using Police Tools like SkopeNow?? If she has to spy on critics then she is too corrupt.
Re: Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 8:51 am
by JustAStudent
The Trump Administrations does not use juvenile, and worthless products like SkopeNow. Too easy to trace..
Re: Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 8:59 am
by BadBaby01
[No candidate should be using police tools. If a judicial candidate is using police tools or their employer, that is a guaranteed sign of corruptions. Madilyn Cole is no different than con-artist Judge Leavitt. Read her judicial rap-sheet.
Re: Should a Judicial candidate Use Police Tools to Spy on Critics?
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:09 am
by VegasGirl001
Great article on defeated judicial candidate Madilyn Cole. She is suspected of using her Clark County, NV badge to spy on her critics with data-scavenger SkopeNow products. SkopeNow is ran by Div. III college grads. No legitimate person trusts SkopeNow products. The CEO Founder of SkopeNow Inc was an* aademic joke in school
